Wed 14 Oct · 09:05 UTC · next morningcheckpoint_load
loader clock 2026-10-14T09:05:12Z
Full checkpoint_load response
Run the same check in Node
Your browser runs six of the loader's seven checks; the seventh, the ledger re-hash, runs only in the real loader. The real checkpoint_load gave the same codes.
node verify-sample.mjs sample.json
Notes come back too. Only the checkpoint notices an edit.
--continue, CLAUDE.md and memory servers bring yesterday back. None checks the file first.
Notes fileCLAUDE.md or auto memory's MEMORY.md
next session
Living Stack checkpointstate.next_step in the file above
checkpoint_load, next session
Same one-line change to both. Use it alongside your notes.
Compare with --continue, CLAUDE.md, Memory MCP and Mem0
claude --continue
CLAUDE.md, auto memory
Memory MCP server
Mem0 OpenMemory
Living Stack checkpoint
What comes back
The full conversation, including tool calls and results
Your instructions and Claude's notes, loaded every session
A knowledge graph kept in a JSONL file, read through the server's tools
Captured preferences and patterns
The saved state and next step
Checked before use
No check described in its docs
No check described; treated as context
No check described
Versioning and audit logs; no integrity check described
State hash, scope, expiry, ledger lineage and the save receipt
One take: save, quit the host, load in a fresh process.
10:05:55.7ZSavedby server pid 12672cp_9969dc8f…state_sha256 d3990d06…
10:05:58Z to 10:06:09ZNothing runningpid 12672 exited (code 0)10:06:06Z: no server running
10:06:09.7ZLoaded: PASSby new server pid 12811cp_9969dc8f…state_sha256 d3990d06…same hash as saved
pid 12672no server, about 11 spid 12811
Values from the take's transcript, drawn to scale: 14 s from save to load.
Full 42-second take, no audio.
One take, 15 Oct 2026. The server is real; a script stands in for Claude Code and pauses 1 to 4 s between calls. About 14 s pass between save and load.
Which code is this?
Repo commit 25fccd8. The bundle you buy was built from 1cd5f61; all 9 runtime files are byte-identical, and both report 0.3.5-beta.1 with 15 tools. The Team server adds 8 more, for 23.
Same outcome, wrong target: UNRESOLVED.
At 18:33 the agent recorded a passing test run for api/retry.test.mjs. Pick what it claims that outcome proves.
Complete Local returns
Show the response
Hand the record to someone else, signed.
The export holds hashes, IDs and decisions, with no prompt text or file contents. The receiver checks it against the installation key they expect.
Expected key: (sample run). A valid signature proves which installation signed the export and that nothing in it changed since. Each claim inside still stands on its own check_claim result.
Check us before you pay.
Does it work?
Free install: Connected, self-test PASS, 7 tools. Checked 15 Oct 2026, 20:22 UTC · Community 0.4.1-beta.1
The recording matches the sold package: 9 of 9 files.
Package hash 02b6debf…af88 is published at checkout and matches the sold bundle.
Full refund within 14 days of purchase, to your original payment method. A refund ends paid access. Refunds
Is it legit?
Operated by Neverclosed (tryneverclosed.com), which runs the checkout (neoaethel.workers.dev) and the install source (github.com/equinoxaifinance-rgb).